After nearly a week's bargaining, the basic framework of the Copenhagen meeting finally began to appear.How to Resume like Katherine Heigl in glasses
Last morning, the reporter, from the conference, has exclusively got the updated edition of Kyoto Protocol marked at 9:30 A. Do You Make These 5 Common Beauty Mistakes with michael jackson M., on 11th, December and the proposal of United Nations climate frame convention. Both of the two manuscripts were submitted for discussion by Secretaiat of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, reflecting the negotiation results of nearly one week.6 Facts about wedding dresses You Must Keep in Mind
From those two drafts, the double-track mechanism was confirmed which is insisting by developing country, one attachment of Kyoto Protocol which including the second promise stage of countries on reduction responsibility will ruled as Kyoto Protocol improved version. As for the participation of non-parties to the Kyoto Protocol such as America, formulations would be made under the framework of the Framework Convention on Climate Change. The two papers contain two seperate negotiations,reflecting the results of official discussions in recent two years.The Kyoto Protocal negotiation parts exclude America.
Article one of the third item of the upgraded version provides that emission reduction goal, written in Accessory I for the developing countries in the second commitment period is reduce by 30% ~45% on the basis of 1990,which is higher than the 25% bottomline suggested by IPCC. However, the exact date of this commitment period had not been finally confirmed. The draft text provided two proposals for a choice. One period is 2013 to 2018, the other is 2013 to 2020. In addition, financial support should provided to developed countries. The specific figures was still not determined in the draft. Moreover, it was not cleared in the convention whether the revised convention is legally binding.
The Convention discussion draft was submitted by the long-term ad hoc cooperation group. It was quite different from the UN Proposal up to 200 pages appeared before. The differences are specifically reflected in this 7-page-long version of "Draft Concerning the Bill from president of AWG-LCA",presented to the negotiators.This version has been narrowed greatly,which shows more consensuses attained through the recent one week negotiation.
However, for the two disputes focus of convention`s legally binding force and financial support, the drafts still do not make clear and definite. Preface of the drafts didn`t mention that this convention is a [legally binding" one. This is very important and pretty worrisome. The Oxfam international senior climate change consultant Antonio Hill indicates that a document with legally binding force is what developing countries requires. Not to make a document having legally binding force, why do we spend so much time on negotiation?" In the proposal drafts,there are no descriptions,relating to the long-term goal of funds support, market trading system,and reinforced adaptive measures and relative methods,which still need to be filled.
Meanwhile, UN Climate Summit subjected to scandal on December 9, becasue that Britain-based The Guardian released one draft resolution made by western countries in December 8. This draft not only endows the developed industrial countries more voices in negotiations on future climate-change issues,but also weakens the UN effects on this issue by discarding the emission reduction principles of the Kyoto Protocal. Thus ttThe draft causes strong resentment and resistance from developing countries, because it is clearly to limit the process of industrialization in developing countries.
According to the report of British "Guardian", the draft which named "Danish Text" is actually a "Western secret." because it was jointly drafted by several western developped industrial countries (like Britain, USA, and Demark, etc.). The draft resolution violated the spirit of "Developped coutries should firstly complete the emmission reduction mission and developping countries should try to complete the emission reduction mission" in Kyoto Protocol, namely, the principle of "The common but different goal". According to the per capita emission standard set by this draft, developed countries can have two times greenhouse gases emission as developing countries.